|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lord Zim
686
   |
Posted - 2012.05.21 22:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Like how you Immed the Gms when ppl started shooting YOU at Burn Jita? Yeah just like that.
You mean "when people exploited bugs"? |
Lord Zim
687
|
Posted - 2012.05.22 06:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:And this broken mechanic has not been changed in how many years?
This "broken mechanic" was put into place in late 2009, after a few months of the entire playerbase which was in the know telling CCP it was making a huge mistake.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Eve subscribers began plummeting and they still refused to change it.
Wait, what? You're trying to tell us "the eve subscribers" are unsubscribing due to us having lots of tech? My, that's interesting.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:The developers seem quite committed to you having a lot of money from PASSIVE INCOME.
You mean PI?
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Maybe they should have fixed that instead of wasting time with datacores.
I can't imagine why they didn't.
You know, paranoia's a hell of a disease. You should get some drugs to fix that for you. |
Lord Zim
688
|
Posted - 2012.05.22 07:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote:but to harvest from a moon are they not required to hold the space
This is not correct.
Shian Yang wrote:control it and protect it against all who would take it from them?
This is correct, however. |
Lord Zim
688
|
Posted - 2012.05.22 08:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Shian Yang wrote:So ... in essence you are saying it is even easier for capsuleer Tassik to capture a moon all for himself? He doesn't even need to hold the space to use it?
Depends on what you put in the word "control". He must "control" the space while his POS is being set up, and he must "control" the space when it's being reinforced or (more likely) right after it comes out of reinforced. We're not talking about hard mechanical control (like in the dominion suck system ... err, I mean sov system), but a much more fluid, and much more time-limited, system control through a very time-specific superiority of firepower. |
Lord Zim
688
|
Posted - 2012.05.22 10:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
Skanky Pickle wrote:That being said, when the Incursion patch first came out it was not uncommon to see entire fleets whiped out while running a Vangard site, as time progressed and people put the time and effort into these events to come up with good fittings for running them to the degree that incursions became safer, then eventually a basic cash cow; the same people arguing to leave Tech alone are the same ones now saying "Hey we worked for this"
Who, exactly, are saying "leave tech alone"? |
Lord Zim
688
|
Posted - 2012.05.22 15:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Who, exactly, are saying "leave tech alone"? You. And every Goon on this thread.
No. You're a lying sack of **** and you should feel bad about yourself.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:You want an unfair advantage that even you can't defend.
Nope. But I won't say no to one when CCP decides to make one.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:So you lie and lie and lie.
The idea that Mittani would have removed Tech Moons is a joke.
Now you're lying and projecting. Biomass yourself. |
Lord Zim
688
|
Posted - 2012.05.22 17:52:00 -
[7] - Quote
Killer Gandry wrote:Also I do remember a directive where it was clearly stated that no Goon shall report another Goon for botting because that isn't a Goons job.
Oh, you mean when we were told to not take matters into our own hands and shoot people we suspected were botting. |
Lord Zim
691
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 07:13:00 -
[8] - Quote
Hedion's oracle wrote:Pink Marshmellow wrote:Technetium is one of the things CCP put into the null to promote fights.
If you nerfed Tech well motivation for fighting would fall greatly. It requires several manhours along with lots of organization of thousands of people to acquire a source of tech. It also requires several hundred hours of posting from the Napfest North countering logical arguments calling for Tec Redistrabution. 
Your arguments are about as good as your spelling, as are your accusations. (To make it easy for you: you're dumb, your arguments are ****, and your spelling is atrocious.)
But hey, if you want to ignore all the times literally the entire playerbase has gone on record to try to get CCP to fix the moongoo consumption imbalance (even before it was an actual imbalance), then go ahead, you're the one who'll end up with egg on your face. |
|
|
| |
|